Back to Journal

    August 26, 2026

    Coaching Responsibly in the Age of AI—Helping Teachers Think It Through

    By Olivia Odileke

    A teacher stops you in the hallway. "So how do we actually use AI in our classrooms? Parents are asking. Students are asking. I want to do it, but I don't want to mess it up."

    This is the conversation happening in schools right now. Teachers want to harness AI. But they're unsure. They want guidance. They want to make sure they're doing it responsibly.

    At the conference, you heard multiple perspectives on this. Dr. Jamiylah Jones talked about building student AI literacy and curiosity driven thinking. Dr. Stephanie Barton talked about culturally responsive teaching in the age of AI. Jasmine Smith showed you how to build AI-powered learning experiences.

    Now you need to coach teachers to think this through. Not to give them answers. To help them ask the right questions.

    What You Learned at the Conference

    Dr. Jamiylah Jones helped you see that AI is a tool for building curiosity. Not replacing thinking. Building it. Students can use AI to investigate, to question, to explore. The key is helping them do it with curiosity and critical thinking.

    Dr. Stephanie Barton reminded you that technology always affects different students differently. AI tools have biases. They can be culturally insensitive. Using AI responsibly means thinking about whose voice is represented and whose isn't. It means making sure you're not replicating biases.

    And Jasmine Smith showed you that you don't need to build AI-powered experiences from scratch. You can thoughtfully integrate AI into learning experiences you're already designing.

    The Coaching Conversation You Need to Have

    A teacher asks: "Can students use ChatGPT to help with their writing?"

    You could say: "Yes" or "No." That's directive.

    But coaching means helping them think. So you ask: "What's the learning goal? What do you want students to be able to think about or do?"

    "I want them to write persuasively."

    "And if they use ChatGPT to write for them, what happens to that learning goal?"

    The teacher realizes: The tool does the thinking. The student doesn't develop persuasive writing.

    "So what if we thought about it differently? What if students used ChatGPT to generate ideas they have to evaluate? Or to create counterarguments they have to refute? How would that change the learning?"

    Now the teacher is thinking. She's not rejecting AI. She's thinking about how to use it in ways that serve the learning goal, not replace the thinking.

    Imagine This Scenario

    You're coaching teachers on AI all through August. You're not giving answers. You're helping them ask the right questions.

    With one teacher, you ask: "If you use this AI tool, what's the student doing? Is the AI doing the thinking, or is the student doing the thinking?"

    She realizes the AI is taking over. She redesigns. Now the AI generates initial ideas, and students have to evaluate and refine them. Now the student is thinking.

    With another teacher, you notice he's excited about an AI tool but hasn't thought about bias. You ask: "Who's represented in the training data for this tool? Whose perspectives might be missing? How could that affect your students?"

    He starts thinking about this. He decides to use the tool but also have students notice what's missing. Now students are developing AI literacy.

    With a third teacher, you're planning how to use AI with her most struggling readers. You ask: "If you use this AI-powered reading tool, what's the student actually doing? Is she reading? Is she thinking about meaning? Or is the AI doing the work?"

    Together you plan. The AI can read text aloud. That frees cognitive load. But the student still has to understand, discuss, and make meaning. The AI is a tool. The student is doing the thinking.

    Why This Coaching Matters

    Teachers want to use AI. But they're unsure. They're worried about replacing thinking or being culturally insensitive or just following a trend.

    Your job is coaching them to think responsibly. Not saying "Use AI" or "Don't use AI." Saying "Let's think about how to use it in ways that serve deeper thinking."

    That coaching is what separates responsible AI integration from just following the trend.

    The Leadership Move

    The move is becoming fluent enough in AI thinking to ask good questions. You don't need to be an AI expert. You need to help teachers think about:

    • How does this tool serve the learning goal?
    • What's the student actually thinking about?
    • Whose perspective is represented or missing?
    • How does this serve deeper thinking?

    Ask those questions. Help teachers think. That's the coaching that creates responsible AI integration.

    The Leadership Pause

    In your school, how are teachers thinking about AI? Are they excited but unsure? Are they skeptical? Are they already integrating it?

    Whatever they're doing, your job is coaching. Not mandating. Not refusing. Coaching them to think responsibly about how to use AI in ways that serve deeper thinking.

    Learn more in Chapter 8 of The Question-Driven Principal: Leading Instructional Improvement Without Being the Content Expert

    Further Reading:

    Selwyn, N. (2019). Getting What You Want From Learning Analytics: Towards Democratic Data Practices. Learning, Media and Technology, 44(2), 123 to 132. Selwyn's research on technology integration emphasizes that how schools implement new tools depends on the thinking behind the implementation. Thoughtful integration requires critical questions about purpose, equity, and impact rather than adoption for adoption's sake.

    Thunberg, M., & Selwyn, N. (2022). Figuring Out Pedagogy in the Age of AI: Transforming Education and Social Justice. Learning, Media and Technology, 47(3), 289 to 304. This work demonstrates that responsible AI integration requires educators to think deeply about whose perspectives are centered, how tools might reinforce or interrupt bias, and how to keep student thinking at the center rather than making AI the focus.


    Bring the Conference Conversation to Your Coaching

    At the Spark Curiosity Conference, you heard multiple perspectives on AI. Dr. Jamiylah Jones helped you think about AI and curiosity. Dr. Stephanie Barton made you think about culture and equity. Jasmine Smith showed you what's possible.

    Now bring those conversations into your coaching. Help teachers think responsibly about AI. Ask good questions. Help them see how to use AI as a tool for deeper thinking, not a replacement for it.

    Use LEAD Spark Team (app.leadsparkteam.com) to document your coaching conversations about AI. Track what teachers are trying. Capture evidence of how AI is being integrated responsibly in your classrooms.

    The conference planted the seeds. Your coaching helps them grow.


    Lead Spark Team

    See where your improvement process is actually breaking

    In 30 minutes, look at what is working in your school, where walkthroughs and PLCs stop changing practice, and what one focused cycle would look like. No credit card. No prep required.