Why We Miss It

Here is the challenge: Most leaders have never been trained to look for cognitive effort.

We have been trained to look for other things. Is the classroom managed? Are students on task? Is the objective written on the board? Did the teacher use the framework? Are students engaged?

These are legitimate things to notice. They do not tell you whether students are thinking.

The Walkthrough Blindness

I have walked classrooms with principals. We see the same room. I see: Students are copying notes from the board. The teacher is explaining the concept. Students are not talking. Work is basic.

The principal sees: This is well-managed. Students are working. The lesson is aligned.

We are looking at the same classroom and seeing different things because we are looking for different things.

The principal is looking for management and alignment. I am looking for cognitive effort.

The problem is not that one of us is wrong. The problem is that the principal has never been trained to ask: Are students thinking?

The Data Meeting Trap

We have data meetings where we look at assessment results. We see that only 30% of students are proficient in area and perimeter.

We ask: Why? What went wrong?

And we come up with theories. Students did not have background knowledge. Students did not attend professional development about this strategy. The pacing was too fast. Students did not have enough practice.

But we rarely ask: Did students understand what they were doing, or were they just following steps?

Because we do not know the answer. We do not have evidence of thinking. We just have evidence of performance.

So we design interventions based on incomplete information. We do more practice. We reteach. We do more data meetings.

And nothing changes.

The Framework Observation

We have instructional frameworks. They describe what good teaching looks like. They often include: Objective, Direct Instruction, Guided Practice, Independent Practice, Closure.

A teacher follows the framework. The lesson has all the components. Students are on task throughout. An observer scores it as proficient.

But did students think? The framework does not require it. The framework can be implemented in a way where the teacher explains everything, students write it down, and nobody actually thinks.

So we can have a classroom that scores well on our observation protocol but has no cognitive effort.

The tools we use to evaluate teaching do not evaluate thinking.

The Assumption That Engagement Equals Thinking

We say students are engaged. They are looking at the board. They are writing. They are following the steps.

But engagement is not the same as thinking. You can be engaged with a task that requires no thinking.

I watched a classroom where students were highly engaged filling out a worksheet. They were focused. They were quiet. They were on task. But every question could be answered by copying from the example the teacher had done on the board.

That is engagement without thinking.

Real thinking requires struggle. Requires confusion. Requires trying an approach and having it not work. Requires arguing about whether something is right.

It does not look as tidy or managed as quiet compliance.

So when we look for engagement, we often miss thinking.

---

Hear scenes like this one on The Leadership Practice podcast at sparkcuriosityedu.com/podcast

School leadership teams can register for a complimentary 45 day Lead Spark Team pilot here: app.leadsparkteam.com/signup